Memory
Stores and Levels of Processing
I. Duplex theory of memory
A. Historical origins: William James, Sigmund Freud, and Hermann Ebbinghaus
B. Modal approach to memory: General characteristics of memory stores (sensory registers, working and long-term memories)
C. Neurophysiological evidence
1. Anterograde amnesia
a. Hippocampectomy: Case of H. M. (Milner, 1966)
b. Korsakoff's syndrome
c. Memento (2001 film)
2. Retrograde amnesia
a. Brain trauma (Lynch & Yarnell, 1973)
b. ECT and failure of consolidation (Cohen, 1997)
D. Serial position curve (e.g., Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966)
1. Primacy and recency
2. Effect
of recall delay
3. Effect
of decreased rate of
presentation or increased rehearsal
4. Developmental trends
E.
Attention
and limited capacity (relation to short-term memory as working memory)
II. Characteristics of short-term (working) memory
A. Short-term in duration (Peterson & Peterson, 1959)
1. Class demonstration: Short-term recall of trigrams
2.
Decay
vs. interference (Waugh & Norman, 1965)
B.
Limited
amount of information (G. A. Miller, 1956)
1. Definition of capacity: Chunks
2. Chunks in chess: deGroot (1966)
3. Capacity limit and attention
C. Forms of representation in STM
1. Articulatory/acoustic: Confusion data (Conrad, 1964)
2. Visual representation in STM: mental imagery (Kosslyn, 1983)
3. Working memory: Central executive (related to attention) and two storage systems--phonological loop and visuo-spatial scratch pad (Baddeley, 1990)
D. Retrieval of information from STM
1. Sternberg (1966) RT to retrieve from memory set
a. Serial vs. parallel processing
b. Exhaustive vs. self-terminating
c. Veridical
vs. idealized representation
2. Interpretation of Sternberg's studies
a. Is
parallel processing still
possible? (Townsend, 1990)
a. Effect of stimulus type (Cavanaugh, 1972; DeRosa & Tkacz, 1976)
E. Purpose of STM
1. Workbench for processing: reasoning, language
2. Storage
into and retrieval from LTM
III.
Characteristics of long-term memory
A. Capacity: no apparent limit
B. Importance of rehearsal
1. Requires use of limited capacity WM (Rundus, 1965)
2. Rehearsal is learned (Flavell et al., 1966, 1970)
3. Rehearsal alone not sufficient (Craik & Tulving, 1975): maintenance vs. elaborative
C. Mnemonics (special case of elaborative rehearsal)
1. Method of loci (Bower, 1970)
2. Peg words (Bugelski et al., 1968)
3. Key words (Atkinson & Raugh, 1975)
4. Organization by category and stories
5. Method of analytic substitutions
6. Use of jingles
7. Mnemonists (e.g., S. [Luria, 1968] et al.)
D. Reasons for forgetting
1. Decay (Thorndike, 1914) vs. interference (Jenkins & Dallenbach, 1924)
2. Proactive vs. retroactive inhibition
3. Retrieval and retrieval failure
a. TOT: tip of the tongue (Brown & McNeill, 1966)
b. Recognition generally better than recall
c. Cued
recall (Tulving & Pearlstone,
1966)
IV. Levels of processing--alternative to memory stores
A. Depth of encoding: Semantic vs. formal processing
1. Defining depth (Craik & Lockhart, 1972)
2. Effect of orienting tasks (e.g., Hyde & Jenkins, 1973)
B.
Encoding
specificity
1. Definition (Tulving & Thomson, 1973)
2. Recognition can be poorer than recall
3.
Relevance of
encoding
specificity to learning
Click here for: